Read reviews of all the supplements I've tried over the years here: www.iherb.com/mypage/lotuspocus

Friday, 30 September 2011

A little alcohol may stave off Alzheimer's

Teetotallers beware. 

A new study published in the August issue of Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment says that a daily cocktail or glass of wine may help delay dementia. 

A meta-analysis of 143 studies on the effects of alcohol on the brain showed that moderate drinking (no more than 2 drinks a day for a man and 1 drink a day for a woman), reduced the risk for Alzheimer's disease and other forms of dementia by 23%.

"It doesn't seem to matter if it's beer, wine, or spirits, as long as the drinking was moderate," said Edward J. Neafsey, PhD, from the Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Therapeutics at Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois.

Dr. Neafsey and coauthor Michael A. Collins, PhD, became interested in whether alcohol might be protective of human brains after experiments showed that rat brains exposed to low doses of alcohol for a few days became resilient when subsequently treated with a toxin.

"If the rat brain slices were treated for 5 or 6 days with low alcohol and then the toxin was administered, there was hardly any damage, whereas if they didn't get the pretreatment with alcohol, there was significant damage," Dr. Neafsey explained.

One theory that Dr. Neafsey and Dr. Collins are working on now holds that alcohol acts as a mild stressor for brain cells and "preconditions" them, making them better able to ward off stress.

"Alcohol does not kill the brain cells, but it's a slight stress. When the cells are exposed they increase levels of various protective compounds, so...they are prepared when something more stressful that might kill or damage them comes along. The theory is called 'preconditioning,' where a mild stress given a few days before a severe stress causes a significant protection," Dr. Neafsey explained.

Heavy Drinking a Different Story
Light to moderate drinking conferred a similar benefit, but heavy drinking (more than 3 to 5 drinks/day) was associated with a higher risk for dementia and cognitive impairment.

In fact, adults who go on occasional binges face a higher risk. A Finnish study showed that adults who binged in midlife at least once a month drinking, for example, more than five bottles of beer or a bottle of wine at one sitting were three times more likely to develop dementia, including Alzheimer's, 25 years later.

Most of the studies did not distinguish between the different types of alcohol, but in a few studies, wine appeared to be more beneficial than beer or spirits. "It really seemed to be that alcohol per se was protective, not the type, because the few studies that did make the distinction reported no difference among the effects of the different types of alcohol," Dr. Neafsey said.





 

Thursday, 29 September 2011

Rice is nice, but beans are better for diabetes

Never mind the gas. Time to pile on the beans and skip the white rice. Research now confirms that white rice is linked to a pre-diabetic stage known as 'metabolic syndrome'.  


More Beans, Less White Rice Tied to Less Diabetes

By Adam Marcus

New York (Reuters Health) Sep 01 -- Beans and rice are a classic combination throughout the western hemisphere, but a study in Costa Rica finds that the bean half of the equation may be better for health.

Researchers found that people who regularly swapped a serving of white rice for one of beans had a 35% lower chance of showing symptoms that usually precede diabetes.

"Rice is very easily converted into sugar by the body. It's very highly processed, it's pure starch and starch is a long chain of glucose," said Dr. Frank Hu, a professor of nutrition and epidemiology at the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, who was part of the study team.

"Beans compared with rice contain much more fiber, certainly more protein and they typically have a lower glycemic index -- meaning they induce much lower insulin responses," he told Reuters Health.

Dr. Hu's group looked at the diets of nearly 1,900 Costa Rican men and women participating in a study of risk factors for heart disease between 1994 and 2004. None of the participants had diabetes at the start of the study.

As Costa Rica has become richer and more urbanized, rice consumption has risen while intake of beans has fallen, Dr. Hu said. Meanwhile, the rate of diabetes in the country has soared.

The extra rice might be at least partly to blame, the Harvard group concludes. They found that people who ate more white rice over time had higher blood pressure and elevated levels of sugar and triglycerides and lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

But in those who substituted a serving of beans for a serving of white rice the risk of metabolic syndrome was reduced by 35%, the researchers reported August 3rd in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

Although rice may be a larger part of diets outside the U.S., the findings have important implications in this country, Dr. Hu said. Americans are consuming more rice than ever, up from 9.5 pounds per person in 1980 to 21 pounds per person in 2008, government figures show. Consumption of dry beans is markedly lower, at about seven pounds a year per person, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

That's a bad trend, said Dr. Hu, especially if people are eating white rice rather than brown rice. From the body's perspective, a serving of white rice "is like eating a candy bar - the fiber and other nutrients are stripped away," said Dr. Hu, who added that the trend "will have long-term metabolic effects."

"It would be useful to introduce more legumes, including beans, into our diet to replace white rice and some of the red meat," he told Reuters Health.

The Harvard team's findings do not prove that white rice raises diabetes risk or that beans lower it. In previous research, Dr. Hu and his colleagues have found that eating brown rice may protect against type 2 diabetes.

"It doesn't surprise me that you get better health outcomes in bean eaters," said Dr. David Jenkins, a nutrition researcher at the University of Toronto who developed the concept of the glycemic index to help diabetics gauge the effect various foods would have on their blood sugar. "Beans are notable among plant foods" for having a modest effect on blood sugar, he explained.

Although Dr. Jenkins said the health benefits of different beans might vary, "as a class they hang together pretty well, and much more uniformly than other foods."


Wednesday, 28 September 2011

Fighting cervical cancer with vinegar and ingenuity

An article from The New York Times shows that sometimes the most effective solution need not be the most expensive. 

Anuree Talasart, a nurse in Roi Et Province, Thailand, teaches women about the female reproductive system. 
Photo: Agnes Dherbeys


POYAI, Thailand — Maikaew Panomyai did a little dance coming out of the examination room, switching her hips, waving her fists in the air and crowing, in her limited English: “Everything’s O.K.! Everything’s O.K.!” Translation: The nurse just told me I do not have cervical cancer, and even the little white spot I had treated three years ago is still gone.

What allowed the nurse to render that reassuring diagnosis was a remarkably simple, brief and inexpensive procedure, one with the potential to do for poor countries what the Pap smear did for rich ones: end cervical cancer’s reign as the No. 1 cancer killer of women. The magic ingredient? Household vinegar.

Every year, more than 250,000 women die of cervical cancer, nearly 85 percent of them in poor and middle-income countries. Decades ago, it killed more American women than any other cancer; now it lags far behind cancers of the lung, breast, colon and skin.

Nurses using the new procedure, developed by experts at the Johns Hopkins medical school in the 1990s and endorsed last year by the World Health Organization, brush vinegar on a woman’s cervix. It makes precancerous spots turn white. They can then be immediately frozen off with a metal probe cooled by a tank of carbon dioxide, available from any Coca-Cola bottling plant.

The procedure is one of a wide array of inexpensive but effective medical advances being tested in developing countries. New cheap diagnostic and surgical techniques, insecticides, drug regimens and prostheses are already beginning to save lives.

With a Pap smear, a doctor takes a scraping from the cervix, which is then sent to a laboratory to be scanned by a pathologist. Many poor countries lack high-quality labs, and the results can take weeks to arrive.

Women who return to distant areas where they live or work are often hard to reach, a problem if it turns out they have precancerous lesions.

Miss Maikaew, 37, could have been one of them. She is a restaurant cashier on faraway Ko Chang, a resort island. She was home in Poyai, a rice-farming village, for a brief visit and was screened at her mother’s urging.

The same thing had happened three years ago, and she did have a white spot then. (They resemble warts, and are caused by the human papillomavirus.) It was frozen off with cryotherapy, which had hurt a little, but was bearable, she said.

Since she has been screened twice in her 30s, her risk of developing cervical cancer has dropped by 65 percent, according to studies by the Alliance for Cervical Cancer Prevention, a coalition of international health organizations funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

The procedure, known as VIA/cryo for visualization of the cervix with acetic acid (vinegar) and treatment with cryotherapy, can be done by a nurse, and only one visit is needed to detect and kill an incipient cancer.

Thailand has gone further than any other nation in adopting it. More than 20 countries, including Ghana and Zimbabwe, have done pilot projects. But in Thailand, VIA/cryo is now routine in 29 of 75 provinces, and 500,000 of the 8 million women, ages 30 to 44, in the target population have been screened at least once.

Dr. Bandit Chumworathayi, a gynecologist at Khon Kaen University who helped run the first Thai study of VIA/cryo, explains that vinegar highlights the tumors because they have more DNA, and thus more protein and less water, than other tissue.

It reveals pre-tumors with more accuracy than a typical Pap smear. But it also has more false positives — spots that turn pale but are not malignant. As a result, some women get unnecessary cryotherapy.

But freezing is about 90 percent effective, and the main side effect is a burning sensation that fades in a day or two.

By contrast, biopsies, the old method, can cause bleeding.

“Some doctors resist” the cryotherapy approach, said Dr. Wachara Eamratsameekool, a gynecologist at rural Roi Et Hospital who helped pioneer the procedure. “They call it ‘poor care for poor people.’ This is a misunderstanding. It’s the most effective use of our resources.”

At a workshop, nurse trainees pored over flash cards showing cervixes with diagnosable problems. They did gynecological exams on lifelike mannequins with plastic cervixes. They performed cryotherapy on sliced frankfurters pinned deep inside plastic pipes. Then, after lunch, they broke into small groups and went by minibus to nearby rural clinics to practice on real women.

Because cervical cancer takes decades to develop, it is too early to prove that Thailand has lowered its cancer rate. In fact, Roi Et Province, where mass screening first began, has a rate higher than normal, but doctors attribute that to the extra testing. But of the 6,000 women recruited 11 years ago for the first trial, not a single one has developed full-blown cancer.

VIA/cryo was pioneered in the 1990s simultaneously by Dr. Paul D. Blumenthal, an American gynecologist working in Africa, and Dr. Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan in India.

Dr. Blumenthal said he and colleagues at the Johns Hopkins medical school had debated ways to make cervical lesions easier to see, and concluded that whitening them with acetic acid would be effective. Freezing off lesions is routine in gynecology and dermatology; the challenge was making it cheap and easy. Liquid nitrogen is hard to get, but carbon dioxide is readily available.

Thailand seems made for the vinegar technique. It has more than 100,000 nurses and a network of rural clinics largely run by them.

Also, while poor rural villagers in many countries go to shamans or herbalists before they see doctors, poor Thais do not. Thailand has a 95 percent literacy rate, and doctors are trusted. The king is the son of a doctor and a nurse; his father trained at Harvard. One of the royal princesses has a doctorate in chemistry and an interest in cancer research.

But the real secret, Dr. Wachara said, is this: “Thailand has Lady Kobchitt.”

Dr. Kobchitt Limpaphayon to her colleagues at Bangkok’s Chulalongkorn University medical school and “Kobbie” to her classmates long ago at New York’s Albany Medical College, she is the gynecologist to the Thai royal family. “Kobbie is a force of nature,” said Dr. Blumenthal, who has taught with her. In 1971, as a young doctor, she moved from Albany to Baltimore to help start the Johns Hopkins Program for International Education in Gynecology and Obstetrics.

In 1999, she read one of Dr. Blumenthal’s papers and asked him to introduce VIA/cryo in Thailand. Without her connections and powers of persuasion, said Dr. Bandit, it would have been impossible to get the conservative Royal Thai College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to give up Pap smears, or to persuade Parliament to allow nurses to do cryotherapy, a procedure previously reserved for doctors.

The free screenings at public clinics are crucial to people like Yupin Promasorn, 36, who was part of Miss Maikaew’s group. She sells snacks in Bangkok, and her husband drives a tuk-tuk motorcycle taxi. With two children, she has no time to wait at Bangkok’s jammed public hospitals, and she is too poor to see a private doctor. So she and her husband drove the 12 hours here, to her native village, in his tuk-tuk. When she found out she was negative, she sat in a chair fanning herself.

“I feel like a heavy mountain is gone from my chest,” she said.



From The New York Times


Tuesday, 27 September 2011

White fruit supremacy

Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nebarnix/
It wasn't too long ago when doctors dismissed the humble apple as a fruit of few nutritional merits; besides being a good source of soluble fibre, it had little vitamin B and C.

Now, a new study might re-instate the apple's leading position in the hierarchy of super foods, at least for keeping strokes at bay. In a study published in Stroke: Journal of the American Heart Association, Dutch researchers discovered that eating apples, pears and other white-fleshed fruits and vegetables might lessen stroke risk by a dramatic 52%. The findings were surprising because vibrantly coloured fruits and vegetables were thought to be more beneficial for health.

In the research, which examined the diets of 20,000 adults over a ten year period, authors investigated the association between the colour of fruits consumed and stroke incidence. Participants had to complete a food frequency questionnaire, which segmented the fleshy part of fruits and vegetables into four colour groups: orange/yellow, red/purple, green and white. After comparing the stroke incidence with the diet of the participants, researches found no link with the quantity of brightly coloured fruits and vegetables.

On the other hand, participants who had a daily intake of 171 grams of white-fleshed produce had a stroke incidence 52% lower than those whose daily intake of such foods was less than 75 grams. White-fleshed produce includes apples, pears, bananas, cauliflower and cucumbers, and 171 grams is approximately the amount found in a typical medium-to-large apple. The average consumption of white fruits and vegetables was highest in this population, and apples and pears were the most commonly consumed of these, making up 55% of intake.

Although it remains unclear why white-fleshed produce dramatically reduced stroke risk, scientists made some postulations. The fibre found in apples and pears is beneficial for cardiovascular health. Additionally, these fruits have high levels of a flavonoid called quercetin, which studies have shown to reduce inflammation. This anti-inflammatory benefit could be a significant contributing factor, since inflammation is associated with the hardening of arteries.

It should be emphasised that the phytochemicals found in vibrantly coloured fruits and vegetables have been associated with a reduced risk of cancer, along with benefits to heart health.


Related posts:
Chocolate lovers less likely to get heart disease or stroke
Magnesium may lower stroke risk
More evidence chocolate lowers stroke risk
Processed red meats linked to stroke
Flavanones in citrus fruits may lower stroke risk


Source: http://yourlife.usatoday.com/health/healthcare/prevention/story/2011-09-16/White-fruits-amp-vegetables-may-lower-stroke-risk/50431028/1?csp=34news

Monday, 26 September 2011

Anti-wrinkle pill cuts crows' feet by up to 30 per cent


World's First Anti-Wrinkle Pill Proven To Make You Look (Sort Of) Younger
 Image via Andrew Bassett/Shutterstock.

Research results from trials on 480 post-menopausal women in Britain, France and Germany suggest that popping pills three times a day can help shrink wrinkles from the inside.

The pills, comprising vitamins C and E along with compounds from soya, tomatoes and omega-3 fatty acids found in fish oils, activate "master" genes which boost collagen levels and improve skin tone.

The research found that after subjects took the pills just three times a day for 14 weeks, their "crow's feet" became 10% shallower on average. In the most successful cases, the wrinkles shrunk by 30 per cent.

Skin biopsies taken from participants in one of the French studies showed that a fifth of women who took the pills had significantly higher amounts of fresh collagen in the dermis – the bottom layer of skin – than those who took the placebo.

Next month, Unilever will release the product in 44 spas it co-owns in Europe and Canada. The pills won't be tested by any regulatory agency in these countries because the ingredients have already been approved and the company isn't claiming that the pills make you healthier.

Nichola Rumsay, of the University of the West of England's appearance research centre, said: "We should be accepting wrinkles gracefully. Someone should develop a pill to stop people worrying about their appearance.

"That would make people a lot happier."


Source: http://jezebel.com/5842768/worlds-first-anti+wrinkle-pill-proven-to-make-you-look-sort-of-younger

 

 

Wednesday, 14 September 2011

Chocolate lovers less likely to get heart disease or stroke

A new study in Paris shows that eating chocolate is good for the heart and brain.

Unlike previous studies which found a beneficial effect only from consuming dark, bitter, cocoa polyphenol-rich chocolate, this new study examined overall chocolate consumption without differentiating between dark, milk, or white chocolate. Chocolate in any form was included, such as chocolate bars, drinks, and even snacks like confectionary, biscuits, desserts and supplements.

The findings, presented at the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2011 Congress, report that individuals who ate the most chocolate had a 37% lower risk of cardiovascular disease and a 29% lower risk of stroke compared with individuals who consumed the least amount of chocolate.

The study comprised an analysis of seven detailed research bodies that included more than 114,000 participants. All studies concluded that increased chocolate consumption was associated with a reduced risk of cardio-metabolic disorders, and that cocoa flavonoids have beneficial effects on insulin sensitivity, blood pressure and blood lipids.

While researchers caution against over-consumption of commercially available chocolate, which can lead to weight gain and increased risk of diabetes due to its high-sugar content, more and more studies seem to vindicate chocolate's health-giving properties.

Perhaps one day, doctors may just recommend a daily bar of chocolate, along with the proverbial apple, to keep illnesses at bay.


Related posts:
White fruit supremacy
More evidence chocolate lowers stroke risk
Magnesium may lower stroke risk
Processed red meats linked to stroke
Flavanones in citrus fruits may lower stroke risk
Trans fat increases stroke risk in postmenopausal women


Source: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/748688?sssdmh=dm1.714234&src=nldne


Check out these chocolate products:


 

Wednesday, 7 September 2011

Television watching - One hour may shorten life by twenty-two minutes

According to a new report by the University of Queensland, a person reduces his lifespan by approximately 22 minutes for every hour spent watching television.

So if you spend six hours a day in front of the box, you are at risk of dying five years sooner than those who enjoy more active pastimes.

This officially puts watching too much TV in the same unhealthy lifestyle category as smoking or being overweight.

The findings are gleaned from a survey of 11,247 Australians from 1999 to 2000, which asked about how much time they spend watching TV, and compared it to mortality figures for the country.

The paper, published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine, revealed that for every hour spent glued to the screen, 21.8 minutes were shaved off life expectancy. So while it's good to vege out in front of the TV, this study supports the view that too much of anything can be bad for your health.

But what about sedentary time spent in front of the computer? By the same logic, it could be as bad as being a couch potato. Here's the scoop: Sit longer, die sooner. 


Sources:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/h...



Sit longer, die sooner

Photo credit: http://www.flickr.com/photos/alvi2047/
Unlike most bad news, this one is best heard standing up: people who sit more than 6 hours a day are more likely to die earlier.

That's even for people who exercise regularly after long sit-a-thons at the office and aren't obese.

While exercising is definitely good for health, the new study indicates that people who spend more time sitting during their leisure time have an increased risk of death, regardless of daily exercise.

That's the sobering news from a new study by the American Cancer Society that tracked 53,000 men and 70,000 women for 14 years and asked them to fill out questionnaires about their physical activity.

Even after adjusting for body mass index (BMI) and smoking, the researchers found that women who sit more than 6 hours a day were 37 percent more likely to die than those who sit less than 3 hours; for men, long-sitters were 17 percent more likely to die.

Even people who exercise regularly had a significant, but lower risk of dying. Those who sat a lot and moved less than three and a half hours daily are the most likely to die early: researchers found a 94 percent increased risk for women and 48 percent increase for men.

Source: http://thechart.blogs.cnn.com/2010/07/22/sit-less-live-longer/